Simple question this week:

Consider a clock with an hour hand and a minute hand. Starting from midnight, how many times do the hands cross each other in 24 hours.

Note, you don't count the starting point of midnight, with the hands overlapping as a crossing, but you do count the last moment, when the two hands overlap at midnight a day later.

Bonus Question:

Normally, clock hands travel clockwise around the clockface. Suppose now that the two hands are travelling in opposite directions. How many times do the hands cross in this case?

## Thursday, 21 March 2019

## Monday, 18 March 2019

### Math at the Movies: x+y

Well, this was a pain in the backside to edit. The film is so tawdry and dull that we kept getting lost on tangents. Fear not though faithful listener, Thomas has edited the two hours of guff down to a single hour of solid... bronze.

If you want to watch x+y, you can follow the link below.

Subscribe via iTunes.

Follow us on twitter @PodcastMathsAt, as well as @ThomasEWoolley and @benmparker.

Today's discussion points include:

From our mouths to your ears, enjoy!- How should you flip a mattress?
- Does the culture you grow up in influence how you learn maths?
- BUMFIT!

If you want to watch x+y, you can follow the link below.

Further reading links:

- As per usual some artistic license was taken with this true story, this website provides the fact behind the fiction;
- Fancy testing yourself with real IMO problems?
- What is the difference between IMO problems and research mathematics?

Subscribe via iTunes.

Follow us on twitter @PodcastMathsAt, as well as @ThomasEWoolley and @benmparker.

## Friday, 15 March 2019

### Answer to Fermat's Room puzzle

A very diffiicult puzzle this week!

Three people guard two doors. You know that:

This is an extension of the famous two person puzzle. Normally, you only have two guards, one tells the truth and one lies. You have to choose and open one of the doors, but you can only ask a single question to one of the guards.

What do you ask so you can pick the door to freedom?

In this case the solution is:

This works by considering the two possible outcomes. Namely:

This puzzle is so famous it's appeared many times in media

The inclusion of the trickster guard, however, changes the puzzle dramatically. Specifically, you questions have to work no matter who is being asked (truth-teller, liar, or trickster). Further, no matter what you ask, you always have to worry about the trickster screwing up your logic.

Thus, one strategy is to identify one person is NOT the trickster. We don't have to identify whether they are truth-teller, or liar.

Call the three gaurds A, B and C. You ask A:

Three people guard two doors. You know that:

- one person always tells the truth;
- one person always lies;
- one person randomly decides whether to tell the truth or lie (assume lies and truth are equally likely);
- the three know amongst themselves who they are.

This is an extension of the famous two person puzzle. Normally, you only have two guards, one tells the truth and one lies. You have to choose and open one of the doors, but you can only ask a single question to one of the guards.

What do you ask so you can pick the door to freedom?

In this case the solution is:

**If I asked what door would lead to freedom, what door would the other guard point to?**This works by considering the two possible outcomes. Namely:

- If you asked the truth-guard, the truth-guard would tell you that the liar-guard would point to the door that leads to death.
- If you asked the liar-guard, the liar-guard would tell you that the truth-guard would point to the door that leads to death.

This puzzle is so famous it's appeared many times in media

The inclusion of the trickster guard, however, changes the puzzle dramatically. Specifically, you questions have to work no matter who is being asked (truth-teller, liar, or trickster). Further, no matter what you ask, you always have to worry about the trickster screwing up your logic.

Thus, one strategy is to identify one person is NOT the trickster. We don't have to identify whether they are truth-teller, or liar.

Call the three gaurds A, B and C. You ask A:

"Is exactly one of these statements true:

If you get back the answer no, then the possibilities are:

Once you have found a person who is not the trickster, just point to a door and ask the person:

"Would your

Thus, reducing the problem to the previous case.

- You are the truth-teller
- B is the trickster

- A is the truth-teller and B is the liar (1. true, 2. false, so one statement true, so answer is yes which truth-teller truthfully gives)
- A is the trickster
- A is the liar and B is the truth-teller (both statements false so answer is no which liar lies about)

If you get back the answer no, then the possibilities are:

- A is the truth-teller and B is the trickster (both statements true, so answer is no which truth-teller truthfully gives)
- A is the trickster
- A is the liar and B is the trickster (1. false, 2. true so one statement true so answer is yes which liar lies about)

Once you have found a person who is not the trickster, just point to a door and ask the person:

"Would your

**exact**opposite say this door leads to freedom?"Thus, reducing the problem to the previous case.

## Tuesday, 5 March 2019

### Maths at the Movies: CUBE

This week is a little different, and I've got to say perhaps one of the most interesting episodes we've ever done!

We are joined by the multi-talented

who uses her research knowledge of evolutionary biology and digital literature to show us how to really write a good movie!

Highlights this week are:

If you're interested in watching CUBE you can follow the Amazon link below.

Further reading links:

Subscribe via iTunes.

Follow us on twitter @PodcastMathsAt, as well as @ThomasEWoolley and @benmparker.

We are joined by the multi-talented

who uses her research knowledge of evolutionary biology and digital literature to show us how to really write a good movie!

Highlights this week are:

- Liz geeking out with Lyle, will they go on holiday together?
- Ben misunderstanding publishing, will he ever get his cheese and wine?
- Thomas reliving his childhood years, when did he stop being so nihilistic

If you're interested in watching CUBE you can follow the Amazon link below.

- Wondering what digital fiction looks like? Well try
*What football will look like in the future*? and prepare to have your horizons expanded. - If you're interested in the future of literature then have a look at Lyle's recent book. It discusses such subjects as: indie publishers, hybrid authors, and fanfiction writers.
- Lyle's also written plenty of digital fiction. Again, this is reading, but not as we know it.
- If you're lazy and got be bothered to read then why not try Lyle's podcast Wonderbox publishing.
- If you've seen CUBE, when not try CUBE ZERO and CUBE 2: Hypercube. They are equally as bonkers!
- The geocities CUBE website that actually investigated the mathematics more than we did!

Subscribe via iTunes.

Follow us on twitter @PodcastMathsAt, as well as @ThomasEWoolley and @benmparker.

## Friday, 1 March 2019

### Puzzle from Fermat's Room

Three people guard two doors. You know that:

Some further rules for the more pedantic:

- one person always tells the truth;
- one person always lies;
- one person randomly decides whether to tell the truth or lie (assume lies and truth are equally likely);
- the three know amongst themselves who they are.

Some further rules for the more pedantic:

- You cannot ask questions like "Will it rain tomorrow?", because neither the truth teller, nor the liar can be sure.
- You cannot ask questions like "What would you answer if I ask you blablabla?", because if you ask the random liar they don't what their next answer will be.
- You cannot ask something like "Will you answer No to this question?", because the truth-teller can't answer this question.
- All decisions must be based on the yes and/or no answers only.
- This puzzle is not about "how to find a way around the rules".

Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)